Yes I realize that fill259
I was just wondering if it was....

Asfridur,,

Excellent.... Kušni - thank you
Everything just got a hole lot more interesting

Agreed. i am a collector. Of howrses, not trophies, so it's good for me.

To me it is just a mini game within a bigger game. That horse is ugly and totally useless to my account. Trophies are not at the top of my list.

I feel the same way Spyder. And I'll be the first to admit hearing about it's features etc. made me more than angry. I still do not like the hole idea of it.

How ever if I can decide to just...

There's honestly quite a few trophies I wouldn't even bother with if they didn't count towards general ranking. Trophies aren't a huge part, but they're still a part

I don't care about ranking. i don't care about many parts of this game anymore. Tired of being told to play the game THEIR way. You want me to follow your orders, hire me and pay me.

I like the companion pets because they are so cute. I like the idea that my horse has a friend to interact with. I was hoping that Howrse would create more of them. Like they brought back the Wandering Horses.

Don't think this needs to be in a spoiler, but I will put it in one just in case. Better to be safe than sorry

Personally I feel that


Hope that made sense without offending anyone.

entering in this discussion regarding the removing and/or replacing the C_Trophy.

will this move from admin devalue the C_ that players have already collected?
does admin not realise there are several player who have hoarded the C_.

yes there are loads of C_ disappearing because of player deleting their accounts or creating pass horses.

does this mean that golden apple trophies should be removed too? there are some golden apple coats that are extremely rare--less than 20 copies left on the game.

should i decided to sell of my C_ collection and admin decides to reinstate or reissue the C_ trophy..will i be compensated?

will a sell off of C_ just ensure that the hoarders will just get another opportunity to hoard even more C's.

give me a break, this a false lead. every newbie goes through envy. i'll never get an olympic trophy or badge or whatever it is that some of the long, long term players had. why? because i joined the game just shortly after the olympics ended.

i'll never have a quiz contributor icon. because i never contributed.
i could have, i just did not.
nor will i ever have a icon for having been part of the ultra competitive howrse games. i just wasn't competitive enough.

i was on the game for over 600 days before i got my first divine.

there are loads of things that i do not have on this game because i either joined too late, or just didn't bother going after the icon.

will our wandering horses be deleted from our pages? not every one has all of them. and it certainly does not appear that there will be an opportunity for players to re-collect them.

no the removal of the C_ trophy is unnecessary and just going to cause a lot of anger, confusion and the deletion of accounts.

howrse NEEDS to go back to the drawing board. this is a horrid decision and it is going to rain CAOS.

oh..btw..how loud should i howl because i do not get a pottok in my wild collection? i've had two opportunites to collect that wild. i have missed out on it twice. howrse should remove all the wild horses from the game..I DID NOT GET ONE THAT I WAS MISSING..wah wah wah. howrse is so unfair.

think on it people..and howrse..really, really, REALLY think on it!!!

here here here. too many changes. the new admin is destroying what is working. many pass buying players will begin to drop off the game. tis sad

@ Λѕнιє

Agreed! I never have a GP winner, never collect the 'collection' trophies for a set of anything, hardly have any divines, etc etc etc. One reason i liked the companions was because in real life, many horses DO have "pets" esp goats, cats. Sure would be cool to have a stable dragon . .. you'd need smoke detectors in case of accident, but you'd never have to worry about any intruders bothering the horses . .. .

Always thought the whole 'trophy' deal was silly. i preferred the objectives where you won things when you accomplished them, and you didn't have to do them if you didn't want to, you could skip them and move on to the next. i felt they were far better in teaching the game to players than the silly tutorial thing.

I was trying to get more horses with companions, not for a trophy but because i think they are cool. if I had to 'buy a horse' for an objective in a promo, if i saw one in the sales with a companion, that's the one i would buy if i could afford it. And since those horses are not top level anymore, thanks to GP inflation caused by teams (and I shall NEVER be on a team because I'm not a pass buyer and play the game my way) this is just more of the Ow Way or the Highway attitude I find to be a bit, well, unmutual.

You have misunderstood me a bit.


I am trying to look on a positive side of things more because of how negative this thread has become on a regular basis lately. Of course I try to back up my positivity with reason and rationality, as well as see things from the other side when making my points.

Maybe this topic wouldn't be so negative if howrse didn't want to implant changes that tick off a lot of players. If they actually made changes that people want, I bet this topic would have a happier and more positive vibe.

I disagree. While I do not like certain changes, I also know that "you can't please everyone". Don't get me wrong, players have every right to be angry. Though I feel people forget that Howrse isn't solely responsible for this negativity. Howrse may have caused it to start but we as players need to take responsibility for perpetuating it (I'm guilty of doing this when news of said change first arrived) and letting it grow to what it has become.

Also even if they made changes that people want, there would still be negativity. Here is why; people have conflicting opinions and ideas. Thus it wouldn't make everyone happy. To a degree, there will always be negativity beside the positivity. It is up to us to decide whether to share our positivity or negativity with the community. I choose positivity, I will send my negativity straight to contact us in order to not spread more here.

I'm not saying people should not voice their emotions and feelings here (particularly the negative ones) but perhaps taking a second to really think about what we post, asking ourselves "what effect will this post have", may prevent the negativity from growing further.

I feel this topic would also be a tad less negative if people were allowed to state their views without being challenged on them. Arguments start because people try and slate another's view and try to say they are wrong. I feel that the majority of us are guilty of this, and perhaps if people just left them be, there wouldn't be such a huge problem. People dislike a change? Let them voice it and don't question it. People like the change? Let them voice it as well and leave them be. At the end of the day we are all allowed an opinion and no one has the right to say it is wrong.

my eyes just rolled so far back in my head they almost cracked.

Positive or negative are labels used by people to shut down conversations. it isn't negative of me to point out, for example, that putting up more development on the waterfront of SF, on landfill, when the ocean is rising, when we are already overbuilt and this place just can't handle Manhattan styled hirises everywhere (we are built on sand, landfill, and frangible bedrock in an earthquake zone), and i have been dissed by our leaders for it. like when i objected to the Millennial Towers project in the mission years ago. Google it and you will see all of my dire predictions are coming true on that project. And yet, they are still going to put ANOTHER similar development RIGHT NEXT DOOR.

Was I being "negative" for 'holding back jobs and progress?" no, i was correct, and our infrastructure is, as I have been yelling for decades, falling completely apart.

I am considered 'negative' because I bring up the fact our emergency services are so inadequate that we can't handle even a minor emergency let alone a major quake.

Is that negative?

And another thing, i don't much care for passive aggressive behavior, and bragging about how "positive' you are doesn't cut it with me.

Yes we have a right to voice our opinions. We all do.

San Francisco used to be a great place to live and visit. Now, thanks to our "game developers" here, it's a hot mess, overcrowded, underfunded, crime ridden and ugly. Nothing to do unless you can spend huge amounts of cash, no music, no art, nothing left that made SF what it was. Those of us who objected to these changes have been forced out by economic cleansing and dishonesty by those in power.

It's a metaphor. If SF had been like this I never would have come here 40 years ago. i didn't agree to any of the changes made by those in power. The carpet baggers and newbies who flocked in here for tech money don't know what they have destroyed. Those in power want us old timers outta here because they prefer people who don't know any better and can't care about what has been destroyed.

If howrse had been like this when I began i never would have stayed.

All that I ask in both cases is be mindful of what your 'progress' has done to those who have been harmed by it. And ask yourself if you'd mind it if it were done to you. Golden Rule, anyone?